One Place after another: Site Specific Art
Mel
Bochner, Measurements room, (1969)
During the period of modernity, the art world took a turn in the direction of
prioritizing function over form; meaning that aesthetics came in second. Site-specific
art is created to exist in a specific
place. The artist takes the location into account when considering ideas as
well as when creating and planning the artwork. Critical artists started to
question galleries and why where they creating artwork to go in a clean white
gallery.
Site specificity sped up the movement towards the notion of de-materialisation and de-asthetisisation.The
first model: in summary is scaled up versions of modernist gallery sculptures
in response to the public's negative opinion of modern architecture. The public
did not receive this well.
The Second Model:
Art as a public place, artworks appropriate to the immediate site (Nancy Hart; Dark
Star Park)Art becoming part of the urban design process, the public reacted better
to these forms, as they can appreciate the pieces as they are accessible and
they fufill more of a purpose. Richard Serra: Tilted Arc a reaction
against this movement, purposely constructed piece that achieved a lot of
negative reactions from the workers of the federal building it was outside of,
as a result it was redesigned in 1997 by Martha Schwartz into landscape
architecture.
(Tilted Arc 1981-89)
The Third Model:
Art in the public interest, rise of community consultation and community
participation. John Ahearn and Rigoberto Torres (South Bronx portraits) were commissioned
to install sculptures outside of a police station they created four plinths
featuring sculptures of black people from the community. These were removed
shortly afterwards due to public outrage and accusations of racism.




No comments:
Post a Comment